3 ms·
Sorry, that's not the correct link. Although that link describes the methodology and data sources, that is the version from 2022. The 2023 source is https://www
by tony_cannistra 3y ago
Sorry, that's not the correct link. Although that link describes the methodology and data sources, that is the version from 2022. The 2023 source is https://www.andersoneconomicgroup.com/many-gas-powered-cars-cheaper-to-fuel-than-electric-in-2023/ https://www.andersoneconomicgroup.com/many-gas-powered-cars-....
- jkubicek 3y agoThanks, updated
- thatfrenchguy 3y agoTheir data is smelly, from a quick computation from EPA.gov ( https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=46356&id=45750&id=45751 https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=46356&... ): a Nissan Versa gets so ~2.9 gallons for 100 miles, a Bolt 29kWh / 100 miles, at $5.025 a gallon (current California gas rates) and $0.26 a kWh (PG&E rate) that'd be ~$14.6 vs ~$7.26. If you compare instead in Texas at ~$3.4 a gallon / $0.14 a kWh, $9.86 / $4.06.
- Vvector 3y agoThe study also adds in "deadhead" time and miles required to drive to/from commercial chargers. It also calculates 12 hours/month waiting for the charger at $33/hour, so $400 extra a month.