> Er, what? GPL is completely fine for corporate use; it doesn't even trigger until you distribute to third parties A lot of us distribute software. It’s not a

> Er, what? GPL is completely fine for corporate use; it doesn't even trigger until you distribute to third parties A lot of us distribute software. It’s not an outlier, it’s the majority. It may have been a different concern 20 years ago, but software and adoption has changed dramatically. > It really doesn't. And if you're at a point where you're arguing that BSL is Open Source but GPL isn't... on the bright side, there's no point in arguing after that; you're clearly in a different world than the rest of us. I’m not. I’m saying that it’s odd to be able to justify GPL as open source yet be unwilling to consider something like BSL as part of the ecosystem. Both have serious restrictions, albeit different. Neither let you “do whatever you want” which some might write is true FOSS.