3 ms·
FIRE is a good cautionary example, but I think it makes the point I wanted to get at: people start out as little meaning-making machines. They connect deeply w
by shanusmagnus 3y ago
FIRE is a good cautionary example, but I think it makes the point I wanted to get at: people start out as little meaning-making machines. They connect deeply with each other, interact easily, enjoy their lives. Then we ruin that.
The FIRE community have won the ruined game -- they're what you get when you remove the financial need, but keep the same psychological objective function, keep the same screwed-up sociality. They might be lounging by the pool but they're still stuck in the old mode of being. The ones who transcend the old workday-grind-mode are doing great. But that's non-trivial.
There was a really good article on this that I found recently ... Ah yes, here it is [1]. This is a thought-provoking take on a similar topic.
[1] https://charleseisenstein.substack.com/p/notes-on-privilege https://charleseisenstein.substack.com/p/notes-on-privilege
- EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 3y ago>> They connect deeply with each other, interact easily, enjoy their lives. looks like someone under influence :)
- shanusmagnus 3y agoHaha, yeah, that's not a bad comparison. Adults intoxicated to a helpful degree behave kind of like children before the modern world grinds away their joy.