for someone who has never used tailwind before, comments like yours read as being emotionally defensive of a tool you like to use. it's fine that you like to us

for someone who has never used tailwind before, comments like yours read as being emotionally defensive of a tool you like to use. it's fine that you like to use said tool, but sentences like this > Whenever I see someone make such a statement, I can tell it's more of a propaganda piece than a piece meant to spawn logical thought. come across as pretty absurd. on whose behalf is the author supposedly writing said propaganda for? Big CSS? the guerilla antitailwindist movement? the irony is you accuse the author of being emotionally biased, yet claim objectivity yourself, while defending said supposed objectivity with language that is far from dispassionate. this may resonate with other tailwind enthusiasts like yourself, but to the outside observer who has no investment (emotional or otherwise) in being either for or against tailwind, it comes across as far more overemotional (to the point of mild absurdity) than the author did in TFA. this ends up having the opposite of what I must presume to be your intended outcome: it leads to the outside observer, reading these comments with mild interest to determine whether or not tailwind is perhaps worth another look since they checked it out last time, to be dissuaded from investigating this tool you like to use any further.