3 ms·
> I guess the reason this quote bothers me so much is that increasing the population in a lot of countries would mean bringing new babies to a life of poverty a
by blvr 15y ago
> I guess the reason this quote bothers me so much is that increasing the population in a lot of countries would mean bringing new babies to a life of poverty and misery.
A lot of people would be surprised to learn that the impoverished peoples in a many those countries are a lot happier we expect. All-in-all they aren't much less happy than we are.
Not saying that wealth isn't a good thing, but it doesn't seem to be a major determining factor in happiness. Not unless you're too poor to get your 1,800 calories or you think you're entitled to wealth you don't have, anyway.
- riffraff 15y agoI am not refuting your point ("money does not happiness make") but AFAIK, it is a known fact that people tend to a state of average happiness no matter what their condition is (e.g. if they lack the ability to walk or if they own private jets). But there is a correlation between the youth/child death rate and the number of kids, and it can be generally agreed death impairs the pursuit of happiness. (Though, quite likely child death implies many kids, not the other way around)
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]