21 ms·
Post histories are the only way to hold people on a pseudonymous website accountable. I think I made it very clear why their opinion should result in a ban. A
by howinteresting 3y ago
Post histories are the only way to hold people on a pseudonymous website accountable.
I think I made it very clear why their opinion should result in a ban.
Also, as a general rule, it's impolite to use anything other than "they" if you don't know someone's pronouns.
edit: any comments on the object-level issue at hand, shkkmo? Or are you going to be like the worst people on the internet and focused entirely on the meta level?
Also, I don't trust dang enough, given reports from Hector Martin and others of being ignored. So I post about it here. (As to why I don't just leave HN, well, it's too important a forum.)
- shkkmo 3y agoYou are the one violating the HN guidelines by dredging up old off-topic comments and derailing the conversation. If you feel like an account deserves a ban for some reason, an email to dang is the correct response. Off-topic comments at not.
- howinteresting 3y agoAny comments on the object-level issue at hand? Even a "While the comment you linked to is reprehensible," will do.
- SenAnder 3y ago[dead]