4 ms·
You correctly point out that the 2016 study might be flawed, but you don't seem to consider the same of the newer study. Why?
by Brusco_RF 3y ago
You correctly point out that the 2016 study might be flawed, but you don't seem to consider the same of the newer study. Why?
- EatingWithForks 3y agoI like newer data than older data, especially since the 2016 study is actually referencing a 2008 study. If we assume they're both true then we shouldn't be talking about men at all, and exclusively focus on the rapid retreat of women from society!
- Brusco_RF 3y agoI actually have less faith in social scientists to design an unbiased study on a sensitive topic in 2023 than I did in 2008. That was my only point