3 ms·
I don't know why I see this type of invalid speculation so often. The author already responded that they reviewed the script and didn't post any sensitive data,
by hn_throwaway_99 3y ago
I don't know why I see this type of invalid speculation so often. The author already responded that they reviewed the script and didn't post any sensitive data, so won't add more to that.
I'd just state that tons of us use ChatGPT effectively and never blindly trust the outputs - for me ChatGPT is a starting point, not the final product. We're not all so daft as that lawyer who cut and pasted hallucinated case references into a legal brief without verifying them first.
- pimpl 3y ago100% agreed, this is how I always treat it and working on the problem from the article was not an exception from this rule. I share minimum input, and never trust the output blindly. It gets 50-60% of work done, and a really good basis for me to work on it. Especially when working with one-off, end-to-end relatively short scripts.
- hn_throwaway_99 3y agoThis has been my primary use case as well (usually for writing some scripts or where I need to solve an operational task quickly), and ChatGPT has saved me a ton of time with those tasks.