4 ms·
That's the nuclear option though. It shouldn't be necessary.
by packetlost 3y ago
That's the nuclear option though. It shouldn't be necessary.
- phone8675309 3y agoIt shouldn't be, but this is such a corner case that I would assume that the developers never considered it.
- derefr 3y agoI mean, "whoopsie" bad pins are the main reason that most headers that indicate caching have max enforced cache lifetimes. According to a previous draft of the Client Hints spec, Accept-CH's cache lifetime was supposed to only be 10 minutes, for exactly that reason! But apparently the only implementation so far (in Chromium) didn't have any internal TTL-based eviction logic for these entries at all...