> Following that line of reasoning shoudln't we be even more wary of e.g. universal suffrage and civil rights laws? Far from me the idea that "younger" laws an

> Following that line of reasoning shoudln't we be even more wary of e.g. universal suffrage and civil rights laws? Far from me the idea that "younger" laws and institutions are suspect. I was just arguing that (unauthorized) reproduction of ideas and designs has been around for a long time, without being perceived as immoral. As you show, various interest groups have sometimes tried, and even succeeded, in legally banning certain forms of it. But it was never seriously accepted that duplication is somehow morally equivalent to theft.