3 ms·

For anyone interested in this topic, there's a thread on Twitter that's been garnering some attention: https://nitter.net/Errorreporrt/status/168583568821682176

For anyone interested in this topic, there's a thread on Twitter that's been garnering some attention: https://nitter.net/Errorreporrt/status/1685835688216821760 https://nitter.net/Errorreporrt/status/1685835688216821760

sampo 3y ago
> a thread on Twitter If you are not logged in to Twitter, Twitter doesn't show the thread, just the first post alone. But you can use nitter.net, if you don't want to log in to Twitter: https://nitter.net/Errorreporrt/status/1685835688216821760 https://nitter.net/Errorreporrt/status/1685835688216821760
- lucideer 3y ago
  Thank you! Edited & will try use in future.
yreg 3y ago
Could we please stop giving attention to the obnoxious anonymous Russian troll who's only proof is a photo of a spec of dust in a syringe, who says she 'didnt follow the paper beause she immediately invented a better way to make a room temp superconductor', who says she 'doesnt care about superconductors' and keeps tweeting USSR propaganda? I really don't get how she keeps getting recommended in these hacker news threads as an interesting source.
- lucideer 3y ago
  Not sure if you're implying she's cooked up a few crucibles at home purely for internet attention (nor what the relevance of her political views are here), but regardless the thread is interesting either way as it's generating lot of general interest in replication. This is perhaps a better link: https://eirifu.wordpress.com/2023/07/30/lk-99-superconductor-summary/#sbtable https://eirifu.wordpress.com/2023/07/30/lk-99-superconductor...
  - yreg 3y ago
    One doesn't need to cook several crucibles to create the photos that were posted. The views are relevant because you are directing people to that account. What exactly is interesting in that thread? It's just cringe talk about 'weapons grade autism' unless I'm missing something.

3 ms·

For anyone interested in this topic, there's a thread on Twitter that's been garnering some attention: https://nitter.net/Errorreporrt/status/168583568821682176

by lucideer 3y ago

sampo 3y ago
> a thread on Twitter If you are not logged in to Twitter, Twitter doesn't show the thread, just the first post alone. But you can use nitter.net, if you don't want to log in to Twitter: https://nitter.net/Errorreporrt/status/1685835688216821760 https://nitter.net/Errorreporrt/status/1685835688216821760
- lucideer 3y ago
  Thank you! Edited & will try use in future.
yreg 3y ago
Could we please stop giving attention to the obnoxious anonymous Russian troll who's only proof is a photo of a spec of dust in a syringe, who says she 'didnt follow the paper beause she immediately invented a better way to make a room temp superconductor', who says she 'doesnt care about superconductors' and keeps tweeting USSR propaganda? I really don't get how she keeps getting recommended in these hacker news threads as an interesting source.
- lucideer 3y ago
  Not sure if you're implying she's cooked up a few crucibles at home purely for internet attention (nor what the relevance of her political views are here), but regardless the thread is interesting either way as it's generating lot of general interest in replication. This is perhaps a better link: https://eirifu.wordpress.com/2023/07/30/lk-99-superconductor-summary/#sbtable https://eirifu.wordpress.com/2023/07/30/lk-99-superconductor...
  - yreg 3y ago
    One doesn't need to cook several crucibles to create the photos that were posted. The views are relevant because you are directing people to that account. What exactly is interesting in that thread? It's just cringe talk about 'weapons grade autism' unless I'm missing something.