4 ms·
If its real, it's going to excite a metric fuckton of funding in hightc superconductors research. It doesn't have to be LK99. It'll be one of the other variant
by tired_and_awake 3y ago
If its real, it's going to excite a metric fuckton of funding in hightc superconductors research.
It doesn't have to be LK99. It'll be one of the other variants that we discover.
Others with more knowledge materials production please add more to this... but it's certainly encouraging there's no rare earth metals or anything radioactive as a component!
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/Timeline_of_Superconductivity_from_1900_to_2015.svg/1280px-Timeline_of_Superconductivity_from_1900_to_2015.svg.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/Ti...
- amluto 3y agoI would much rather have rare earth metals involved than lead. (Rare earths are neither particularly rare nor particularly toxic. They do seem to have the annoying property that there aren’t that many large rare earth mines.)