3 ms·
> 14 years to repeal It took that long to repeal because it was an amendment (and thus needed another amendment to repeal it). The rest of your post basically
by dvt 3y ago
> 14 years to repeal
It took that long to repeal because it was an amendment (and thus needed another amendment to repeal it). The rest of your post basically says people drank less therefore less people drank (it's obvious that if less people drink, less people will have alcohol problems). I'm not sure if the academic consensus is that it was "mixed," most top search results seem to agree that it was kind of a failure[1][2], but to be fair I never studied it in depth and Google can be biased.
[1] https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/alcohol-prohibition-was-failure https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/alcohol-prohibition-was...
[2] https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/progressive-era-to-new-era-1900-1929/prohibition-case-study-of-progressive-reform/ https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-histor...
- freddie_mercury 3y agoIf the goal was to have to people drink less.... And then they drank less... How is that an abject failure? I'm not really clear what you're trying to argue here. Could you be more explicit?
- dvt 3y ago> I'm not really clear what you're trying to argue here. Prohibition fell out of popularity, so to me it seems like it was a failure because it didn't significantly impact domestic policy in the long-term. As opposed to something like women's suffrage.