4 ms·
I think you're taking their choice of a single word a bit too seriously, and dare I say, personally. I don't think they're claiming to be the first to have ever
by TechBro8615 3y ago
I think you're taking their choice of a single word a bit too seriously, and dare I say, personally. I don't think they're claiming to be the first to have ever discovered this attack vector, nor are they trying to steal credit from you. And while "novel" might not be the best word choice, in common parlance it need not mean "unique," and can just as well mean "unusual." In fact the dictionary definition of "novel" literally includes "unusual" ("new or unusual in an interesting way").
- thatguy27 3y agoYour dictionary definition / denotation is not the connotation "novel" has in research.
- justsomeadvice0 3y agoYea, agree with this guy. Anyways I took "novel attack vector" to just mean "first time we've heard of using SSPR against AD". They even used the existing acronym "SSPR", so they're not claiming to have discovered the attack vector or anything.