"Wrong" doesn't make much sense here. The more inductive bias we think is appropriate which we try to shove into models, the worse they perform. There's also an

"Wrong" doesn't make much sense here. The more inductive bias we think is appropriate which we try to shove into models, the worse they perform. There's also an awful lot of fabrication the brain does with sense data, rationales etc. all of this is to say we have no clue what makes us tick. This means there's absolutely no guarantee we would recognize a replication of "human" Something different is not necessarily "wrong". a plane's flight is no less "true" than a bird. It's not flying the "wrong" way. Trying to elevate our very poor and wrong understanding of "human" to be the same as "right" or "true" is very silly. Even Biology with its set of constraints does not always solve the same problem the same way. Who are you to dub one way "right" ? Makes no sense.