3 ms·

Grab a copy of netpbm or GraphicsMagick that's compiled for Windows. Or, grab a free image editor (https://www.getpaint.net/ https://www.getpaint.net/ is popul

• JohnFen 3y ago
  This. I honestly don't understand why people use online image converters when there are high-quality OSS programs that will do the job locally. I'll bet that the majority of the online converters are using these programs to do the actual conversion anyway.
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  • andrei_says_ 3y ago
    Tinypng consistently creates better looking jpg and ping files than the Photoshop’s exporting algorithm- at the same filesize. I have optimage and imageoptim on MacOS too and they are good enough at this point.
  • wruza 3y ago
    https://www.google.com/search?q=convert+jpg+to+png https://www.google.com/search?q=convert+jpg+to+png That’s why. And also because sometimes it just works. I’ve done some packet-level work recently and wanted to decode text. The tools I’ve used were some online converters, not iconv or base64. Because experimenting with their modes adds mental overhead even if I more or less can use them without man. Choosing from-to and pasting text into a textbox takes no brain capacity. 25+ years ago, when internet wasn’t very accessible, there were multiple simple windows apps to do small things like this. Now they are online, but open source and new apps world in general never figured out that users still need it - simple, discoverable, easy to use tools. I’m not gonna scroll through pages of magick options and (in case it just works based on .ext, which I also should re-figure out from the lack of such option) try to remember if there’s -i and -o required for input and output.