3 ms·
I feel like that is excessively uncharitable. It was a proven winner product with a million $10+ burgers sold in months. If you have a golden goose you should
by BizarroLand 3y ago
I feel like that is excessively uncharitable.
It was a proven winner product with a million $10+ burgers sold in months. If you have a golden goose you should care for it.
Plus, they haven't paid MrBeast yet either, so that's a double whammy against them.
- kjs3 3y agoIf you have a golden goose you should care for it. Which, clearly, wasn't done. By anyone. But if your name is on it... so that's a double whammy against them. Why? Do you know how the contract was written? Particularly since the outsource company appears to be fronting the production, and "MrBeast" seems to be just lending his name (tho those details are light). There's a ton of ways to structure a deal like this that don't mean "didn't pay" == "bad actor".