3 ms·
After racing with each other to fuel political extremism or push the corporate narratives like how working from home is terrible for the worker or how good it i
by wallaBBB 3y ago
After racing with each other to fuel political extremism or push the corporate narratives like how working from home is terrible for the worker or how good it is for us that the rich don’t pay the taxes, how unaffordable housing is good for the economy… this is what they choose to be careful about?
Nah, this just doesn’t sell or is not a paid article.
- fragmede 3y agoThe EmDrive was first publicized in 2001, but wasn't picked up by the mainstream media until 2013, and then again in 2016 after NASA picked it up. That Korean scientists have this discovery on their hands and the materials world is racing to keep up, and isn't frontpage of the New York Times, is editor's choice. Currently, that's Joseph Kahn, but (unfortunately) science ranks below politics and sports and business.
- stusmall 3y agoIt's hard to not let cynicism like this get to me especially when the argument makes so little sense. This doesn't sell? Isn't sensationalist enough? A possible end result of this is magic flying space trains. This isn't exactly some boring in the weeds things. This is extremely easy to hype if you just want to draw eye balls. But sure, yeah, MSM corporate plutocracy or whatever.
- mycologos 3y agoIt's possible that the people responsible for deciding what makes a a good article for the science section are different from the people responsible for the articles you mention.
- lucubratory 3y agoI think this is true