5 ms·
So he outsourced to someone who outsourced to random ghost kitchens in markets he was interested in and is shocked, shocked I say, that a lack of oversight has
by kjs3 3y ago
So he outsourced to someone who outsourced to random ghost kitchens in markets he was interested in and is shocked, shocked I say, that a lack of oversight has resulted in an inferior product.
- BizarroLand 3y agoI feel like that is excessively uncharitable. It was a proven winner product with a million $10+ burgers sold in months. If you have a golden goose you should care for it. Plus, they haven't paid MrBeast yet either, so that's a double whammy against them.
- kjs3 3y agoIf you have a golden goose you should care for it. Which, clearly, wasn't done. By anyone. But if your name is on it... so that's a double whammy against them. Why? Do you know how the contract was written? Particularly since the outsource company appears to be fronting the production, and "MrBeast" seems to be just lending his name (tho those details are light). There's a ton of ways to structure a deal like this that don't mean "didn't pay" == "bad actor".
- mensetmanusman 3y agoOutsourcing doesn’t necessarily mean lack of oversight. Suing your supply chain is a form of oversight regardless.
- kjs3 3y agoFor some of us, 'oversight' means identifying and correcting issues before lawyering up. But, sure, I've definitely seen people claiming that addressing a problem only after it's out of control is perfectly cromulent.