4 ms·
This is still problematic though because revenue from these new licenses will effectively flow to the PM through this _new_, significantly larger, contract. Thi
by slantedview 3y ago
This is still problematic though because revenue from these new licenses will effectively flow to the PM through this _new_, significantly larger, contract. This is why divestment is important for politicians.
- lotsofpulp 3y agoHow is he going to divest? Divorce his wife?
- cowpig 3y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_trust https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_trust
- eesmith 3y agoThat's a possibility ... if it's your own money. I'm pretty sure lotsofpulp's underlying question is, how would that - or any divestment - work when it's the PM's father-in-law which has the shares and is chairman emeritus? Are all relatives within distance X supposed to divest? And if not, you can't become PM? Hopefully they all like you enough!
- lotsofpulp 3y agoThe point is he is invested in Infosys because his father in law is invested in Infosys. Nothing can change that, other than him no longer being related or caring about his father in law, and hence his wife.