4 ms·
I'm going to be honest, I did this evaluation several months ago and I don't remember all of the exact points. If I remember: * I did not like that it was an a
by dimmke 3y ago
I'm going to be honest, I did this evaluation several months ago and I don't remember all of the exact points. If I remember:
* I did not like that it was an alternative to a different Facebook rich text editor (draft.js)
* Very React focused (makes sense, it's a Facebook/Meta project) - even applying concepts. Here's an excerpt from their site: "If you've used React Hooks before, you can think of $ functions as being something that follows a similar pattern. These are functions that show their intent as to where they can or cannot be used."
I don't want to use React Hooks or things designed to be like React Hooks.
* Newer and less features/polished. Looking at their official project site, there's way less features already available. That means more custom code you have to write.
* No standard schema/for formatting rich content