4 ms·

> I'm really glad I chose it over Lexical and other options. Congrats Do you mind expanding on this? I've been comparing the two and found the lexical data mod

> I'm really glad I chose it over Lexical and other options. Congrats Do you mind expanding on this? I've been comparing the two and found the lexical data model easier to understand.

egonschiele 3y ago
Have you tried using Lexical? I found it to be very buggy and ended up replacing it with Quill.
- tin7in 3y ago
  Would you mind elaborating on Lexical? Which parts did you find buggy?
dimmke 3y ago
I'm going to be honest, I did this evaluation several months ago and I don't remember all of the exact points. If I remember: * I did not like that it was an alternative to a different Facebook rich text editor (draft.js) * Very React focused (makes sense, it's a Facebook/Meta project) - even applying concepts. Here's an excerpt from their site: "If you've used React Hooks before, you can think of $ functions as being something that follows a similar pattern. These are functions that show their intent as to where they can or cannot be used." I don't want to use React Hooks or things designed to be like React Hooks. * Newer and less features/polished. Looking at their official project site, there's way less features already available. That means more custom code you have to write. * No standard schema/for formatting rich content
JimDabell 3y ago
It doesn't include Lexical, but GitLab did a detailed comparison of rich text editors a while back and settled on Tiptap. Their write-ups are pretty detailed: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/231725 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/231725 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/273238 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/273238
- patrickbaber 3y ago
  Thanks for the links to the discussion, I wasn't aware of it. Seems like a nice long read and find out what others think about us. I will read it.
- patrickbaber 3y ago
  The first link shows a discussion that started in July 2020, when Tiptap was only available in version 1. The new major version 2, which is a complete rewrite, was in development. The biggest drawback the GitLab engineers had was the lack of a test suite in Tiptap 1. That's understandable, because as a key component of your application, testing is necessary to ensure that you catch breakable changes. Tiptap 2 does just that. [1] [1] https://github.com/ueberdosis/tiptap/tree/develop/tests https://github.com/ueberdosis/tiptap/tree/develop/tests

> I'm really glad I chose it over Lexical and other options. Congrats Do you mind expanding on this? I've been comparing the two and found the lexical data model easier to understand.

egonschiele 3y ago

Have you tried using Lexical? I found it to be very buggy and ended up replacing it with Quill.

tin7in 3y ago
Would you mind elaborating on Lexical? Which parts did you find buggy?

dimmke 3y ago

I'm going to be honest, I did this evaluation several months ago and I don't remember all of the exact points. If I remember: * I did not like that it was an alternative to a different Facebook rich text editor (draft.js) * Very React focused (makes sense, it's a Facebook/Meta project) - even applying concepts. Here's an excerpt from their site: "If you've used React Hooks before, you can think of $ functions as being something that follows a similar pattern. These are functions that show their intent as to where they can or cannot be used." I don't want to use React Hooks or things designed to be like React Hooks. * Newer and less features/polished. Looking at their official project site, there's way less features already available. That means more custom code you have to write. * No standard schema/for formatting rich content

JimDabell 3y ago

It doesn't include Lexical, but GitLab did a detailed comparison of rich text editors a while back and settled on Tiptap. Their write-ups are pretty detailed: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/231725 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/231725 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/273238 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/273238

patrickbaber 3y ago
Thanks for the links to the discussion, I wasn't aware of it. Seems like a nice long read and find out what others think about us. I will read it.
patrickbaber 3y ago
The first link shows a discussion that started in July 2020, when Tiptap was only available in version 1. The new major version 2, which is a complete rewrite, was in development. The biggest drawback the GitLab engineers had was the lack of a test suite in Tiptap 1. That's understandable, because as a key component of your application, testing is necessary to ensure that you catch breakable changes. Tiptap 2 does just that. [1] [1] https://github.com/ueberdosis/tiptap/tree/develop/tests https://github.com/ueberdosis/tiptap/tree/develop/tests