> Do people have the right to stipulate they don't want their original creative works ingested by an algorithm and then regurgitated out on a prompt thereby ben

> Do people have the right to stipulate they don't want their original creative works ingested by an algorithm and then regurgitated out on a prompt thereby benefitting the corporation who owns the algorithm and not the original artist? Most times somebody makes this case it's explicitly framed as "AI owned by big corporations". I can see why this makes the argument more compelling but does the argument stand without this? i.e. if we are talking about an open model with no corporate control then do you feel your point is as strong as before? These models indisputably exist. I think there is still a reasonable case to be made but I think it's slightly dishonest to make it in this way when we know that things have moved on.