4 ms·
You should check out Pijul, as it essentially implements everything you mentioned here. Pijul works on patches which are CRDTs, it makes conflicts a first-class
by ChadNauseam 3y ago
You should check out Pijul, as it essentially implements everything you mentioned here. Pijul works on patches which are CRDTs, it makes conflicts a first-class concept, etc.
- conaclos 3y agoI wonder: Is there a git backend for Pijul?
- IlliOnato 3y agoI will be surprised if it's possible at all. And I think right now such a back-end would not be high on Pijul priority list. But if I am wrong, I would be very interested to learn about it!
- ParetoOptimal 3y agoLong ago I suggested it as a way to get market share and it seemed not very high priority.
- josephg 3y agoPijul is interesting, but my understanding is that it still operates on lines, and does diffs when you push the commit button. And that makes it not work well for real-time collaborative editing. Ideally I’d like a tool that can span both the real-time collaborative editing and offline collaboration use cases. But it’s a very interesting tool, and I’d like to have another read through the docs at some point. I remember being very impressed with it when I took a look a few years ago.
- olodus 3y agoLast time I looked at it they had experimental support for binary diffs (not just lines). That was quite a while ago though, they have probably gotten further now.