5 ms·
The headline is misleading because this is not a "claimed successful replication" of the superconductivity experiment. All they're confirming is that they produ
by gary_0 3y ago
The headline is misleading because this is not a "claimed successful replication" of the superconductivity experiment. All they're confirming is that they produced a diamagnetic substance: https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/claims-of-room-temperature-and-ambient-pressure-superconductor.1106083/page-11?post=94266395#post-94266395 https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/claims-of-room-tempe... See Notes for the Huazhong University entry.
The translated sources do not have the scientists claiming superconductivity either.
- tatrajim 3y agoYou appear to be mixing up this claim with another. This one is from Huazhong University of Science and Technology, not Southeast University. The situation is fluid and many extraordinary claims are being made, e.g. see the link below "Second #lk99 replication from China". https://twitter.com/lereguy/status/1686363900651151360 https://twitter.com/lereguy/status/1686363900651151360 To some extent this particular thread on HN is dated.
- gary_0 3y agoYou're correct, I updated my comment. I'm having trouble keeping track of all the videos of floating specks of junk. At any rate, there are currently no "successful replications" of the superconductivity result.
- fnordpiglet 3y agoThe tweet says Huazhong University of Science and Technology, and it’s more recent than the most recent change for Huazhong University of Science and Technology on the space battles forum.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- dang 3y agoOk, we've changed the title above to one that you suggested elsewhere. Thanks!