3 ms·
> For example, if you could remove the cooling requirements for MRI scanners But MRI is almost the only tech we know today to be affected by this (and we could
by littlestymaar 3y ago
> For example, if you could remove the cooling requirements for MRI scanners
But MRI is almost the only tech we know today to be affected by this (and we could count maglev as well, but I don't think it'll change the landscape too much here, as the deployment of high speed trains un general is less technologically limited than it is by limited politcal will).
And even for MRI, room-temperature SC is only a big deal if you can find zone that works for high current, wich isn't the case here son far.
- RyEgswuCsn 3y agoPetrol is just "better" coal. Except that you can't make flight with steam engines. When room-temperature SC becomes possible, previously unthinkable applications suddenly become viable.
- littlestymaar 3y agoMaybe, but the same was already said when cuprate SC appeared in the late eighties with their relatively high critical T°, but they haven't really fulfilled their promise…
- chasd00 3y agoIirc the LHC experiment would not be possible without those superconductors. That’s a pretty big deal.
- RyEgswuCsn 3y agoAre they really the same though? I mean we are talking about room temperature, not the"(relatively) high temperature", a term that is arguably misleading to a layperson. I'd imagine most people who are informed of the difference would recognize that cuprate SC is nowhere near as useful.
- Firmwarrior 3y agoEvery article older than a couple weeks talking about superconductors goes on and on about how useful they are, except for the logistics of keeping them cold Example: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_energy_storage https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_ene...
- littlestymaar 3y agoSuperconductors suporting high current are incredibly useful, but that's a big caveat. There's a reason MRI scans still use the super tedious helium-cooling instead of a much simpler nitrogen cooking allowed by cuprates: the cuprates SC aren't good enough for MRI.
- buildsjets 3y agoJust to be the pedantic one… I did some searching and found one single example of a steam-powered aircraft that actually flew. A bunch of other attempts are listed on wiki, all unsuccessful. https://books.google.com/books?id=AygDAAAAMBAJ&dq=Popular+Science+1933+plane+%22Popular+Science%22&pg=PA9#v=onepage&q=Popular%20Science%201933%20plane%20%22Popular%20Science%22&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=AygDAAAAMBAJ&dq=Popular+Sc...
- buildsjets 3y agoAnd thanks, now I am researching small steam boilers that I could install in a Pietenpol homebuilt aircraft that a friend and I have been talking about building for a few years now. All I need is 30 kilowatts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pietenpol_Air_Camper https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pietenpol_Air_Camper
- RyEgswuCsn 3y agoI knew it! Yeah, I really meant coal-powered steam engines.
- buildsjets 3y agoIf you built a coal gasifier, or maybe used a powdered/pelletized form of coal, I could see it being plausible. (but still dumb) Having just returned from a week at the Experimental Aircraft Association’s yearly gathering, I’m kind of interested in using up some of my employer’s time to see if I can make it work, at least on paper. Luckily I even have a budget line available for silly studies like this.
- eesmith 3y agoSweet! I found a video clip at https://archive.org/details/turner_video_11514 https://archive.org/details/turner_video_11514 at timestamp 54:47 for about 20 seconds. (Found that reference via https://web.archive.org/web/20030203103015/http://www.flysteam.co.uk/history.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20030203103015/http://www.flyste... which I found via https://archive.org/details/australian_model_engineering-issue_110-2003_09_10/page/32/mode/2up?q=%22steam+powered+aircraft%22 https://archive.org/details/australian_model_engineering-iss... )
- rurban 3y agoBut not visiting Andromeda, the next star system. Which would be the only such application I can think of now.
- CharlieDigital 3y agoAs if the US is the only country. Plenty of EU countries, China, and Japan would invest in developing even higher speed rail options.
- littlestymaar 3y agoI'm French, and France has one of the biggest high-speed train network, and the limitation to build additionnal lines isn't a technological one…
- CharlieDigital 3y agoI'd agree that it's not technological: it's cost and practicality.
- malka 3y agotrains that float above the rail means less maintenance. the high cost of trains is partly due to the maintenance of the rail network.
- zarzavat 3y agoThe speed of trains is generally not limited by engineering. It’s limited by corners, i.e. obstacles. There are already very fast trains in existence that don’t use maglev.
- CharlieDigital 3y agoYou're assuming they'd replace existing routes rather than build new routes that would suit the higher speeds.
- delfinom 3y agoThat's the main problem, building a rail line zigzagging around the country is arguably a ton easier than having to legislate, seize, steal and forcibly bulldoze a straight path for a maglev.
- halfdeadcat 3y agoSMES systems offer grid-level energy storage at about 98% efficiency. You could also move nuclear reactors to the middle of the desert because no one wants them in their backyard, then losslessly transport their power back to the grid. Same for bringing power from solar and wind installations. These are just two examples with immediate commercial application. The economics of energy production shift when you eliminate 15% of the cost and distance limitations. That would have a big impact on decarbonization. Longer term, josephson junctions replace transistors in processors.
- u320 3y agoYou could put nuclear reactors in the middle of the desert today (ignoring cooling for now). The reasons we don't typically do it has nothing to do with resistance.