You are technically correct, which Futurama calls 'the best kind of correct', but it isn't really. When you're arguing about what kind of thing a thing is, you

You are technically correct, which Futurama calls 'the best kind of correct', but it isn't really. When you're arguing about what kind of thing a thing is, you can call that a semantic argument, but if you're trying to characterize something that exists in practice, this is different from fighting over dictionary definitions. (Interestingly, I got into the contrapositive of this argument on HN the other day: I tried to use a math term to mean something closely related to the standard definition, and people jumped on me for misusing it.)