3 ms·
I never bought into the Jamstack. Static website --> Use one of many no-code/low-code services. There's no longer a big market for static websites built from t
by senttoschool 3y ago
I never bought into the Jamstack.
Static website --> Use one of many no-code/low-code services. There's no longer a big market for static websites built from the ground up.
Database driven pages --> Impractical with Jamstack. Client-side rendering is ok. SSR is usually best.
Website that has static pages and database driven pages --> Same as above. This is why I always told people to start off with Next.js, even if you're making a static website. If you ever want database driven pages, it's far easier to add them if you're already using Next.js but not if you're using something like Gatsby.
I've never bothered to learn any Jamstack frameworks because of the above reasoning.
- papertokyo 3y agoNext.js is Jamstack. It just has other rendering modes besides SSG. So does Nuxt.js and SvelteKit. Gatsby recently added SSR, but it lagged a long way behind Next, so they definitely missed the boat.