3 ms·
I understand. I'm saying that it's not LK-99 as described, then. Rather, it's something else that needs a more precise specification.
by dcow 3y ago
I understand. I'm saying that it's not LK-99 as described, then. Rather, it's something else that needs a more precise specification.
- pengaru 3y agoOr it's lk-99 as described, 5% of the time... basically they need to tune the process to improve yields. I'm not sure if that means it wouldn't be LK-99 if that's all that's going on here. /me skeptical either way
- xbmcuser 3y agoAh no they called the working prototype LK-99 so if it works it is if it does not then it is not. Instead of what you are saying that it works so is not LK-99.