> What you probably want to argue I don't really want to argue either because I'm not a lawyer and from a lay perspective AI works don't seem to fit neatly int

> What you probably want to argue I don't really want to argue either because I'm not a lawyer and from a lay perspective AI works don't seem to fit neatly into either category. It's obvious to me that infringement occurs in spirit, which is effectively what i'm arguing; beyond that I really couldn't speculate on the details of how a successful case to that effect would be built, or how new law would be written.