> Why do these kinds of articles essentially refuse to admit RISC-V exists? Because as much as I like RISC-V myself, it hasn't built up the scale needed to sup

> Why do these kinds of articles essentially refuse to admit RISC-V exists? Because as much as I like RISC-V myself, it hasn't built up the scale needed to supplant x86/64 or ARM. It's still a long way to go before the following are achieved: - Similar/better performance to x86/64 or ARM, with at least 80% of their performance - Similar/lower prices compared against x86/64 or ARM - A win in either price-to-performance or power-to-performance against x86/64 or ARM at some point.