A good case that consistent brainwashing is likely laborious to do manually. But why leave the job to humans? I expect an effective approach is to have model

A good case that consistent brainwashing is likely laborious to do manually. But why leave the job to humans? I expect an effective approach is to have model A generate many possible ways of testing model B, regarding an altered fact. Then update B wherever it hasn't fully incorporated the new "fact". My guess is that each time B was corrected, the incidence of future failures to product the new "fact" would drop precipitously.