4 ms·
That is a good way for a company to be better prepared three years from now. Right now, there is a shortage.
by mcculley 3y ago
That is a good way for a company to be better prepared three years from now. Right now, there is a shortage.
- reducesuffering 3y agoSo not paying enough 3 years ago caused a shortage now. Yes, there is a pay problem that eventually caused a shortage, got it.
- mcculley 3y agoYes. When USCG rolled out Subchapter M and increased demand, one solution would have been for companies to hire three years previously people that they did not need and find a way to get them the necessary seatime. Maybe they could have installed more bunks on the boats.
- genocidicbunny 3y agoWhen did they roll it out? From what I can tell, this was in 2016? Why is there a shortage now then if it takes 3 years to get to captain?
- thulle 3y agoGot interested, found this: > Although the Coast Guard released Subchapter M on July 20, 2016, vessels had two years to meet the majority of the requirements — the deadline falling on July 20, 2018. The Coast Guard is trying to work with the tug and towing companies to make for a smooth transition into the new regulations with minimal downtime. The entirety of the law will be phased in over a six-year period. > The next deadline for obtaining a certificate of inspection (COI) is in 2019. By July 22nd, 25 percent of towing and tugboat companies’ vessels must have a COI onboard. The percentage increases by 25 percent each year after until all vessels in the fleet have their COI onboard. - https://www.mitags.org/subchapter-m-training/ https://www.mitags.org/subchapter-m-training/
- mcculley 3y agoI wrote that three years is theoretically the fastest one could get enough seatime. This would mean three years constantly at sea. Most take at least double that.
- genocidicbunny 3y agoSo that means that there should be new captains entering the workforce right around now (7 years post-fact, nevermind that the rules were probably not just sprung on you in 2016 but there was some forewarning even before then.)
- mcculley 3y agoYes, my company could have hired unlicensed deckhands that they did not need then and invested in them in the hopes that they would become captains later. I don’t know what boats they would have found to fit them onto at the time. It is a shame smart people were not around to advise. I have done quite a lot to entice potential captains to join us over the last 3 years. Very few potential candidates are excited about the lifestyle, especially during the time when ZIRP was funding companies doing nothing.
- genocidicbunny 3y ago> that they did not need then But you did need them, as evidenced by the fact that now you're having trouble finding captains. You needed them then so they could be trained to be captains now. Yeah, training and growing people is an investment. Yeah, it doesn't always pay off. But you don't get to complain when you didn't invest that you didn't reap the rewards of your nonexistent investment. > I have done quite a lot to entice potential captains to join us over the last 3 years. Very few potential candidates are excited about the lifestyle, especially during the time when ZIRP was funding companies doing nothing. And as some others have asked you, what are you offering a starting deckhand? Give us at least a range for pay.
- mcculley 3y ago
- devnullbrain 3y agoI wonder if there were any unusual events happening in global markets 3 years ago? A lack of prescience is not unique to tugboats.
- mcculley 3y agoIndeed. A lot of the captains retired early when things slowed down.