3 ms·
From what I have gathered reading things online, there is some theorizing that given a "perfect" baking process there is something probabilistic going on that m
by ecshafer 3y ago
From what I have gathered reading things online, there is some theorizing that given a "perfect" baking process there is something probabilistic going on that means your batch is never 100%.
disclaimer not a physicist or chemist
- cyberax 3y agoI'm not a material scientist, but I've spoken with folks who do advanced vapor deposition and thin-film synthesis for high-temperature superconductors (the ones that work at liquid-nitrogen temperature). It's basically witchcraft-adjacent, with so many variables that getting everything right is an art. That's why we're only now getting practical high-TC superconducting tape, even though the original materials were discovered in 80-s. The best way right now would be for the Korean team to send their sample to a reputable lab for testing. Once its properties are verified, labs can start deconstructing the process.
- xorbax 3y agoYou're producing a nanoscale material through macroscale processes It's not quite like asking somebody with a hammer and chisel to produce a microchip, but depending on how many processes and sensitive variables affect your chemical processes, it ain't far off. Maybes it's cooling rate. Maybe it's venting phosphorous gas. Maybe it's introducing ambient air. Maybe oxygen would be better. Maybe it should be faster. Maybe it should be introduced slower with faster cooling. Or slower cooling. Maybe the oven heats funny and placement matters given the distribution and the heating is the key. Experimental chemistry can be a real pain, and it takes quite a lot to figure out what you've got.
- floxy 3y agoHere is the exact ratio of carbon to hydrogen to oxygen to phosphorus to nitrogen. Mix them together and bake to get DNA.