5 ms·
It’s honestly insufferable. Makes me want the version with zero guardrails even more if this is the future I have to put up with.
by whywhywhywhy 3y ago
It’s honestly insufferable.
Makes me want the version with zero guardrails even more if this is the future I have to put up with.
- taberiand 3y agoChatGPT custom instructions work decently well to consistently put it in the required frame of mind.
- redeeman 3y agobut... it might say something that someone is gonna find offensive somewhere if they try hard.. nah, best have it be gimped
- WalterBright 3y agoPeople who are offended by a computer program need to get outside more.
- bentcorner 3y agoWhereas people who are offended by what people did while creating a computer program are right and just? You can't have it both ways.
- Bootvis 3y agoSmall nuance: I’m not offended by the restrictions but inconvenienced and therefore annoyed.
- guy98238710 3y ago> Whereas people who are offended by what people did while creating a computer program are right and just? Yes. We are being treated like children and subjected to lectures by an AI. That's understandably offensive.
- Xcelerate 3y agoAre there any articles describing how GPT-4 without guardrails is different than the public version? I would be super interested in what the model’s actual “most probable next token” looks like.
- jojobas 3y ago[flagged]
- techdragon 3y agoDespite some initial fun, I quickly got hesitant to do any more amateur “red team” experiments with ChatGPT because I was finding it useful enough that getting banned would be too big of a risk… It was surprisingly easy to do once you internalised the word prediction foundation and thought about the corpus of writing you have ever read in a “tropes” fashion. For instance it’s really easy to get it to give you some “mills and Boone” romance novel type sentences or dialog, but when you can keep it on track it’s terrible at romantic “escalation” (the stuff where the relationship or interaction between characters is undergoing the implicit consent negotiation and furtive suggestions as they work out things will “move to the next base”) … And it’s terrible because the bulk of the available writing corpus of romance and interpersonal/intimacy is padded for page count and long sentence descriptions of small details… It’s actually quite remarkable to see how it can be good at the bulk of the text, but simultaneously so terrible at a specific subset of that kind of writing.
- yosito 3y agoSide note, we should start using the term "consent negotiation" instead of "escalation" when teaching people about relationships. "Escalation" seems like one person aiming for a goal and the agency of the other person can be easily ignored. Whereas "consent negotiation" implies that there are multiple autonomous agents each with their own desires and boundaries that must be respected to arrive at a mutually agreeable outcome.
- 3y ago
- wkat4242 3y agoIt's annoying indeed. You can almost feel all the weasly lawyers and PR people training the thing.
- decremental 3y ago[dead]