If you did so and as a consequence it was provable that far fewer people saw Oppenheimer, resulting in economic damages to the copyright owner, then the summari

If you did so and as a consequence it was provable that far fewer people saw Oppenheimer, resulting in economic damages to the copyright owner, then the summarization may not qualify as fair use and might very well be a crime. (Btw I'm not saying that's the case, but that's essentially the argument)