I'm the one who posted the comment you're referring to, and the poster you're responding to has it correct. > but also why would they make it, publish a fake p

I'm the one who posted the comment you're referring to, and the poster you're responding to has it correct. > but also why would they make it, publish a fake process and then go through all this rigamarole? That was what I said, and here you're saying "Anyway I simply responded with some reasons why one might publish a fake process and go through all the rigamarole." You ignored the first part of the sentence - I didn't ask why they'd publish a fake process, I asked why they would make it (it being a room temp superconductor) and then publish a fake process.