4 ms·
I intentionally picked the favorable numbers as I was expecting even with those it would turn out to be a pretty futile endeavor, even ignoring things like fore
by danbruc 3y ago
I intentionally picked the favorable numbers as I was expecting even with those it would turn out to be a pretty futile endeavor, even ignoring things like forest fires. And it pretty much is, at least with a billion trees. And for a trillion trees I can not see how this could realistically happen. I would have to plant a tree every three weeks for the next seven and a half years, 125 trees in total, that sounds not too impossible. But once you consider that everyone in your city will have to the same - and every other human on earth - I don't think it would be too long before I would no longer be able to find a spot for the next tree where it interferes with nothing and can grow for a couple of decades.
- delecti 3y ago"Fortunately" for the sake of this problem, we've got 1000 years of land that was cleared to get lumber. Not all of it is land that we could replant trees on (some being used for farming or housing), but for a decade-long society-wide project I wouldn't be too concerned, if there were actually political will to do it.