> you're are also having problems developing AI I have no interest in talking computers. cf. James Mickens' USENIX Security '18-Q keynote speech: "Why Do Keyn

> you're are also having problems developing AI I have no interest in talking computers. cf. James Mickens' USENIX Security '18-Q keynote speech: "Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajGX7odA87k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajGX7odA87k Anyway, they're just a pile of linear algebra and a massive pile of Other People's Data, eh? (And piles and piles of hype, my god, so much hype. Even in the "academic" papers!) The difficulty would lie in amassing that data, not in developing software. You would have to solve that "conflict of conscience" first, no? But more to the point: none of my goals can be advanced by talking computers. - - - - > Is there an AI stack that RMS would approve/use? I have no idea. You could ask him if you're really interested.