> For the most part, ML doesn't control high-risk things with a human in the loop. That was never my argument. (I assume you mean "without") You said: > > M

> For the most part, ML doesn't control high-risk things with a human in the loop. That was never my argument. (I assume you mean "without") You said: > > ML risks can range from accidents to annoyances. Ignoring second-order effects isn't reasonable. Global warming is an indirect, nth-order effect from an industrialized economy based on fossil fuels.