3 ms·
I think AMD is at the very least, credible. https://wccftech.com/amd-instinct-mi250-boosted-ai-performance-pytorch-2-0-rocm-5-4-closes-in-on-nvidia-gpus/ https
by SirMaster 3y ago
I think AMD is at the very least, credible.
https://wccftech.com/amd-instinct-mi250-boosted-ai-performance-pytorch-2-0-rocm-5-4-closes-in-on-nvidia-gpus/ https://wccftech.com/amd-instinct-mi250-boosted-ai-performan...
I think they are better than people give them credit for. They seem to have a stigma against them.
Nobody wants to make a large deployment of AMD hardware because there are of course risks involved and nobody wants to be the one to blame if it doesn't work out. I can't blame them, but that doesn't mean it wont potentially still work out.
All it takes is for a big successful deployment I think.
- tikkun 3y ago> All it takes is for a big successful deployment I think. Yes - I think one company doing a big deployment of AMD GPUs for training and inference would be extremely confidence boosting for other companies. I wonder why AMD doesn't do it themselves.
- p1esk 3y agoIf investors ask me whether to build AI supercomputer using AMD cards (rather than Nvidia), today I would say no.
- tinktank 3y agowhy?