3 ms·
For such an obscurantist profession, the quality of technical writing in books by magicians is so incredibly consistent. I'm going to recommend another really
by empath-nirvana 3y ago
For such an obscurantist profession, the quality of technical writing in books by magicians is so incredibly consistent.
I'm going to recommend another really excellent, long out of print book by a famous magician:
https://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Derren%20Brown%20-%20Pure%20Effect.pdf https://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Derren%20Brown%20-%20Pure%2...
It's an absolute gold mine of tips on performance and full of detailed technical explanations of how he did some of his most famous illusions. (and the answer is not NLP or subliminal suggestion or anything he talks about in his patter, most of the time).
- jdietrich 3y agoI'd like to recommend two of Darwin Ortiz's books, Strong Magic and Designing Miracles. They're high-level theoretical texts on the perceptual and cognitive basis of illusion and I've found them to have a great deal of applicability to UI/UX design.
- tptacek 3y agoIt helps when the magician is Ricky Jay!
- laurieg 3y agoThat is a fantastic book. It was very much written for magicians and gives away many of Derren Brown's famous routines so reader beware! The aspects of showmanship and performance really stuck with me. I often remember snippets of the book even today. One of my favourite stories is when Derren is having dinner with friends and their child says "Show me a magic trick!" So Derren asks the child to name a card. He then flips over, by pure coincidence, the card the child named. Of course, he was planning on doing a more elaborate routine but he was present enough to notice that he would not be able to top his accidental trick and put the cards away. He talks a lot about taking risks in performance and being attentive to the energy in the room. Of course, you need some solid reliable tricks as well to back this up!
- empath-nirvana 3y agoAlso where he talks about how the performance of mind reading. I think a way to think about it is that it _is_ mind reading in a way, in the sense that you have to understand how your audience is perceiving _you_, that you need to act in a way that matches their _expectation_ of how someone who could genuinely read minds would behave. His real genius is in identifying a kind of pseudo-scientific patter that would allow a skeptic to enjoy a mind reading performance. You can do the same crude trick that a mentalist or spiritualist would do, and wrap it in patter about neuro-linguistic programming and subliminal messages and psychology and with a few winks to let them think they're in on the secret and suddenly a hard bitten skeptic falls for the same sleight of hand trick that a gullible grandma fell for in the 19th century. Like, he accurately says that what he's doing isn't paranormal or "real", but his explanation on stage almost never matches what he's really doing.
- gowld 3y agoThat's mind-writing, not mind-reading.