I agree wholeheartedly with this caveat. Her works are really great as a non-standard (and admittedly very controversial) perspective, but can be really mislead

I agree wholeheartedly with this caveat. Her works are really great as a non-standard (and admittedly very controversial) perspective, but can be really misleading if they are the first thing you read. I should have included something along these lines in my original recommendation, thanks!