4 ms·
That's not so much a comparison, as it is a collection of bland facts about each solution. Those facts may not even be a good basis for making a choice and it d
by hobofan 3y ago
That's not so much a comparison, as it is a collection of bland facts about each solution. Those facts may not even be a good basis for making a choice and it doesn't give any guidance on why each of them may be important.
It also looses out on qualitative attributes that distinguish some of them from the others. E.g. Weaviate has a lot better DX (in my opinion) than any of the others as, as it handles integration of different vectorizers etc. a lot better, which makes it stand out.
- tinyhouse 3y agoCompletely agree. A bunch of "facts" copied from the providers website. Funny they have a conclusion section. You could probably write something better with AI.
- dfee 3y agoThat article’s conclusion reads like AI content. As an aside, I’m not sure if I’ve just made a low value comment. If someone comes to the comments first, I hope they’re informed of my conclusion and take that into consideration before clicking through. I wonder how dang feels about these sorts of comments.
- alfalfasprout 3y agoAgreed. Reads like it was written by a low parameter count LLM.
- evgen 3y agoAnd just like that I have my new favorite put-down for low-effort comments and mediocre posts. Thanks!
- esafak 3y agoThis article is trash; no need to prevaricate.