3 ms·
We do have a solution - just bury it underground. And the best part is: it gets safer with time!
by kgabis 3y ago
We do have a solution - just bury it underground. And the best part is: it gets safer with time!
- thelazyone 3y agoI remember an anti-nuclear talking about the Finnish project for long term storage. He was depicting the project cost (4 billions) as ridicolously high and therefore unfeasible. Interesting that each plant (around 10 billions?) of Finland could use it for 100 years... seems like a no brainer to me!
- yellowapple 3y agoThe trick is picking a place to bury it; apparently all the US states with suitable locations for nuclear plants somehow lack suitable locations for waste storage, or else they wouldn't insist on shipping it to a state without any nuclear plants at all (oh but it was also the one state that got repeatedly nuked during tests, so I guess that makes it okay).