4 ms·
> many of the felled trees will have been “replanted on site” or replaced elsewhere, and the vast majority were part of a commercial crop that would have been
by _aavaa_ 3y ago
> many of the felled trees will have been “replanted on site” or replaced elsewhere, and the vast majority were part of a commercial crop that would have been chopped down anyway “at the end of their rotation”.
- jsiepkes 3y agoUnless I see some hard facts to back that claim up I'm inclined to put as much faith in this as the average "carbon offset" scheme. Sounds like "spreadsheet wishful thinking" to me.
- kramerger 3y agoWhy is this type of scepticism always one sided? Shouldn't you also question the other guys claims?
- jsiepkes 3y agoBoth claims (the number of chopped down trees and the compensation) are made by the same person. "Yes I admit I broke something, but I compensated for it somewhere else"...