I don't think the premise is correct. AI is often used term late into the product lifecycle. When Apple or Google or the technology press say a product has impr

I don't think the premise is correct. AI is often used term late into the product lifecycle. When Apple or Google or the technology press say a product has improved it's dictation they say the "AI" has improved. When we talk historically about deep blue we categorize it as an early AI project to have computers beet humans at chess. Fair that AI is a vague term for software with some training stage or approach to analyze data; But I don't see the term not being used to describe past innovation in that (admittedly vague) domain. The author is likely thinking about the moving goalposts of human excepltionalism as AI gains capabilities which has a history of coverage itself; but goes about this in a roundabout way and I don't think it applies in the way the author is proposing per more specific language being the problem All to say unfortunate article given such a cool article title :)