4 ms·
I don’t think you can objectively say Tolstoy was a worse literary artist than Dostoyevsky. For me it’s absolutely the other way around. Dostoyevsky saw into m
by saberience 3y ago
I don’t think you can objectively say Tolstoy was a worse literary artist than Dostoyevsky.
For me it’s absolutely the other way around. Dostoyevsky saw into men’s souls in a way no other writer perhaps barring Shakespeare could. Tolstoy for me is more mechanically or technically good, but Dostoyevsky was a true artist and saw through life and humanity at another level.
- wholinator2 3y agoThat's what they said > But Tolstoy was an infinitely better literary artist than Dostoevsky could ever hope to be.
- dmvdoug 3y agoRight. Dostoevsky was perfect on the human element. Tolstoy on the writing.