4 ms·
They might believe their prior statements on the matter no longer apply since the transition to proof-of-stake? (I am not saying this is a good argument, but it
by saurik 3y ago
They might believe their prior statements on the matter no longer apply since the transition to proof-of-stake? (I am not saying this is a good argument, but it is one I think I have seen people come up with.)
- junofan 3y agoYeah but their whole thing is that the specifics of the technology don’t change how securities laws apply. They’d likely claim both the miners and the stakers need to form an organization and have somebody responsible for compliance, if their proposed rules on altering the exchange definition is any indication.