You're right, I didn't read it. I'm responding to comments in general on this article and others, which is full of misconceptions. I didn't bother with the arti

You're right, I didn't read it. I'm responding to comments in general on this article and others, which is full of misconceptions. I didn't bother with the article itself because every single one I've read is also full of misconceptions or incomplete information or uncharitable interpretations or unsubstantiated personal attacks against Sam Altman. > As Molly points out, you're making a huge assumption that this number that uniquely identifies your iris isn't useful information to sell to someone (or for someone to hack). How would someone possibly use the information that you've already scanned your iris to your detriment? How does that benefit anyone?